Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Coronary Artery Disease

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Coronary Artery Disease.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
17.352
Coronary Artery Disease
  1. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.749
  2. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  3. Exploring the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 15; 207:505-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.725
  4. Can We Predict Who Will Have Angina Relief From Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 04; 16(4):e013020.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.699
  5. Cut, score, press, shock, or ablate? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 05; 101(6):975-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.697
  6. Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.687
  7. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.684
  8. Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.675
  9. Should CFR Be Routinely Measured in the Cath Lab? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 05 23; 15(10):1057-1059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  10. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.649
  11. Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Feb; 18(2):103-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  12. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  13. Newsflash, PCI Works: Stenting Stenoses Increases Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise and Reduces Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 08 28; 72(9):984-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.509
  14. A Perspective on Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenoses in Series: Methods, Myths, and Best Practices? JAMA Cardiol. 2018 05 01; 3(5):368-370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.498
  15. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pressure Pullback With Virtual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planning: Seeing the Future of Coronary Interventions? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 04 23; 11(8):768-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.497
  16. Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers. Circulation. 2017 12 12; 136(24):2295-2297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  17. Stimulating Extracardiac Collaterals via Right Internal Mammary Artery Occlusion: Another Step Into an Undiscovered Country. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 06; 10(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.467
  18. Late breaking trials of 2016 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering SCAI, ACC, TCT, EuroPCR, ESC, and AHA. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May; 89(6):1028-1034.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.460
  19. Does the AToMIC trial explode concerns of contrast coagulopathy? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov; 88(5):738-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  20. Late breaking trials of 2015 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering ACC, EuroPCR, SCAI, TCT, ESC, and AHA. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun; 87(7):1224-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.428
  21. Is the left main just another artery to FFR? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 86(1):19-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  22. Selecting the Right Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unsteady State: Keep It Simple. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 8(8):1028-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  23. 38 mm Stents: go big and go long. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 01; 85(2):225-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  24. Robotic-assist PCI: precision guided PCI or a rube goldberg solution? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 01; 83(6):922-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  25. Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep 01; 84(3):416-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  26. Optimizing femoral access outcomes: how far can we go? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 01; 78(1):52-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.310
  27. Best Practices for Use of the Super High Pressure OPN Balloon. Am J Cardiol. 2026 Apr 15; 265:32-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  28. Mechanical outcomes of coronary stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Sep 15; 435:133387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  29. Coronary computed tomography angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: Expert opinion from a SCAI/SCCT roundtable. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025 May-Jun; 19(3):277-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  30. Adenosine Contrast Correlations in Evaluating Revascularization: The (ACCELERATION) Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun; 18(6):e015240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  31. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Super High-Pressure Balloon (SIS-OPN) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 03; 105(4):938-950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  32. Does PPG, the Other Dimension to FFR, Better Predict Post-PCI Results? Circulation. 2024 Aug 20; 150(8):598-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  33. The Hype Cycle in Interventional Cardiology and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 15; 225:35-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  34. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  35. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  36. Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Using a Pressure Sensing Microcatheter: The ACIST-FFR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 05 25; 13(10):1272-1275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  37. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  38. Outcomes With Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization of Coronary Lesions With Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 12; 12(12):e008315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  39. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  40. Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):2035-2046.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  41. Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 09 01; 4(9):857-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  42. Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 01 22; 8(2):e010373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  43. Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 08 13; 11(15):1437-1449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  44. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec; 10(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  45. Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery disease: a practical approach to optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve. Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Nov; 25(7):608-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  46. Invasive testing for coronary artery disease: FFR, IVUS, OCT, NIRS. Cardiol Clin. 2014 Aug; 32(3):405-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  47. Disparity between angiographic coronary lesion complexity and lipid core plaques assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(3):529-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.