Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
24.151
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
  1. Does PPG, the Other Dimension to FFR, Better Predict Post-PCI Results? Circulation. 2024 Aug 20; 150(8):598-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.773
  2. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.752
  3. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.744
  4. Exploring the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 15; 207:505-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.728
  5. Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.690
  6. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.686
  7. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023 01; 12(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.682
  8. Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.678
  9. Should CFR Be Routinely Measured in the Cath Lab? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 05 23; 15(10):1057-1059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.662
  10. Understanding Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance Can Provide Coronary Clarity. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 05 03; 11(9):e026118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  11. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.652
  12. QFR accuracy and Pd/pa:FFR discordance: Too much inside baseball or novel physiologic insight? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 01; 97(5):833-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.611
  13. FFRCT : Getting better all the time (but not there yet). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 03; 97(4):623-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.608
  14. How strong is the warranty of a negative FFR? Comment on long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions by Weerts et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 02 01; 97(2):257-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.605
  15. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio - Can we really get there from here? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1154-1155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.594
  16. Comparing QFR and FFR in small vessels-Expanding the spectrum of use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):752-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.591
  17. Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on translesional coronary hemodynamics. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):871-877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.579
  18. Is There a Paradox of FFR Outcomes in Diabetic Patients? Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 07; 21(7):903-904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  19. Better measurement repeatability of FFR than CFR: Role of the human error factor. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 11 01; 94(5):684-685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.554
  20. Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 09 01; 94(3):364-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.548
  21. High FFR strongly predicts arterial graft dysfunction: pure benefit in a pure population? Eur Heart J. 2019 08 01; 40(29):2429-2431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.545
  22. Changes in Resting Coronary Blood Flow During a Cardiac Catheterization Procedure - Implications for Use of Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratios for Lesion Assessment. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 08; 20(8):636-637.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.539
  23. Fractional flow reserve from intravascular ultrasound imaging: Computational fluid dynamics to the rescue? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 02 01; 93(2):275-277.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.526
  24. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.526
  25. dPR, Another Diastolic Resting Pressure Ratio. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 12; 11(12):e007540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.520
  26. Caution! You're approaching a gray zone: FFR outcomes and the role of CFR and IMR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 11 15; 92(6):1088-1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.519
  27. Why does FFR-guided PCI improve clinical outcomes? The missing link of post-PCI ischemia reduction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):701-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.514
  28. Newsflash, PCI Works: Stenting Stenoses Increases Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise and Reduces Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 08 28; 72(9):984-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  29. FFR-Guided CABG: Will Simpler and Better Be Enough to Change Practice? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 11(6):e006827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  30. Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers. Circulation. 2017 12 12; 136(24):2295-2297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.486
  31. Deferred lesion failure in diabetes: A truly bad actor. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 12 01; 90(7):1084-1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  32. Agreement and Differences Among Resting Coronary Physiological Indices: Are All Things Equal? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 10 24; 70(17):2124-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  33. Does pre-PCI FFR predict post-PCI blood flow increase? do we need IMR too? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 02 01; 89(2):243-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.458
  34. Myocardial Contrast Stress Echo Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A Fair Fight Among Ischemic Tests? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 08; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  35. Is the left main just another artery to FFR? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 86(1):19-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  36. Selecting the Right Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unsteady State: Keep It Simple. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 8(8):1028-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  37. Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep 01; 84(3):416-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  38. Interpreting drug effects on coronary flow reserve after PTCA: clarity or confusion? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar; 81(4):687-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  39. Adenosine Contrast Correlations in Evaluating Revascularization: The (ACCELERATION) Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun; 18(6):e015240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  40. The Hype Cycle in Interventional Cardiology and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 15; 225:35-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  41. Microvascular Resistance Reserve and?the?STEMI Patient: Putting a Finer Point on the CFR Pencil? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 27; 17(10):1228-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  42. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  43. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  44. Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 09 15; 9(18):e018344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  45. Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Using a Pressure Sensing Microcatheter: The ACIST-FFR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 05 25; 13(10):1272-1275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  46. Outcomes With Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization of Coronary Lesions With Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 12; 12(12):e008315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  47. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  48. Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):2035-2046.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  49. Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD?Revascularization Following Physiological?Coronary?Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 02 05; 73(4):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  50. Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 08 13; 11(15):1437-1449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  51. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec; 10(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  52. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio?Outcomes?and the Epistemology?of?Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 12 26; 10(24):2511-2513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  53. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 05 11; 376(19):1824-1834.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  54. On the search for an "easy" FFR: Submaximal hyperemia and NTG-induced translesional pressure drop (Pd/Pa-NTG). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 01; 87(2):270-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  55. Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery disease: a practical approach to optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve. Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Nov; 25(7):608-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  56. Invasive testing for coronary artery disease: FFR, IVUS, OCT, NIRS. Cardiol Clin. 2014 Aug; 32(3):405-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  57. Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 09 01; 4(9):857-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.