Header Logo

Connection

Tina Pesaran to Female

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Tina Pesaran has written about Female.
Connection Strength

0.666
  1. Combining multiplexed assays of variant effect for enhanced BRCA2 variant classification. Nat Commun. 2026 Apr 09; 17(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  2. BRCA1-, BRCA2-, and PALB2-related Fanconi anemia: Scope to expand disease phenotypic features and predict breast cancer risk in heterozygotes. Am J Hum Genet. 2025 12 04; 112(12):2902-2921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  3. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline PALB2 sequence variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Oct 02; 112(10):2266-2280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  4. Quantifying evidence for phenotypic specificity (PP4) for syndromic phenotypes: Large-scale integration of rare germline FH variants from diagnostic laboratory testing for HLRCC and renal cancer. Genet Med. 2025 Nov; 27(11):101565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  5. Association of gene variant type and location with breast cancer risk in the general population. Ann Oncol. 2025 Aug; 36(8):954-963.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  6. Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes Predispose to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 06; 31(1):130-138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  7. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline ATM sequence variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov 07; 111(11):2411-2426.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  8. Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 05; 111(9):2044-2058.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  9. Functional analysis and clinical classification of 462 germline BRCA2 missense variants affecting the DNA binding domain. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 03 07; 111(3):584-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  10. Functional and Clinical Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance Identifies a Hotspot for Inactivating Missense Variants in RAD51C. Cancer Res. 2023 08 01; 83(15):2557-2571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Classification of the canonical splice alteration MUTYH c.934-2A > G is likely benign based on RNA and clinical data. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2022 01; 8(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. J Clin Oncol. 2021 12 10; 39(35):3918-3926.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  13. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Test Results for Women With Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 10 01; 113(10):1429-1433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  14. Risk of Late-Onset Breast Cancer in Genetically Predisposed Women. J Clin Oncol. 2021 11 01; 39(31):3430-3440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Case-case analysis addressing ascertainment bias for multigene panel testing implicates BRCA1 and PALB2 in endometrial cancer. Hum Mutat. 2021 10; 42(10):1265-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  16. Strong functional data for pathogenicity or neutrality classify BRCA2 DNA-binding-domain variants of uncertain significance. Am J Hum Genet. 2021 03 04; 108(3):458-468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. The Contribution of Germline Predisposition Gene Mutations to Clinical Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancer From a Clinical Genetic Testing Cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 12 14; 112(12):1231-1241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Genotype-phenotype correlations among TP53 carriers: Literature review and analysis of probands undergoing multi-gene panel testing and single-gene testing. Cancer Genet. 2020 10; 248-249:11-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  19. Suggested application of HER2+ breast tumor phenotype for germline TP53 variant classification within ACMG/AMP guidelines. Hum Mutat. 2020 09; 41(9):1555-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  20. Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort. Genet Med. 2020 04; 22(4):701-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  21. A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Genet Med. 2020 02; 22(2):407-415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  22. Tumour characteristics provide evidence for germline mismatch repair missense variant pathogenicity. J Med Genet. 2020 Jan; 57(1):62-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Risk Genes Identified by Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 08 01; 110(8):855-862.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  24. DNA breakpoint assay reveals a majority of gross duplications occur in tandem reducing VUS classifications in breast cancer predisposition genes. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):683-693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  25. Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 01; 3(9):1190-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  26. Combined genetic and splicing analysis of BRCA1 c.[594-2A>C; 641A>G] highlights the relevance of naturally occurring in-frame transcripts for developing disease gene variant classification algorithms. Hum Mol Genet. 2016 06 01; 25(11):2256-2268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  27. ClinGen and Genetic Testing. N Engl J Med. 2015 10; 373(14):1376-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  28. Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genet Med. 2014 Nov; 16(11):830-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.