Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Coronary Angiography.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
9.166
Coronary Angiography
  1. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  2. Does the AToMIC trial explode concerns of contrast coagulopathy? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov; 88(5):738-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  3. Is the left main just another artery to FFR? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 86(1):19-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  4. A return to a commonsense MI definition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr; 85(5):930-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  5. Balloon-assisted tracking for transradial catheterization: beating the curve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb; 83(2):221-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  6. Perioperative MI: is there a clot or not? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 01; 82(4):629-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  7. Upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for STEMI: use on-time or not at all? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May 01; 79(6):965-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  8. Coronary computed tomography angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: Expert opinion from a SCAI/SCCT roundtable. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025 May-Jun; 19(3):277-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.218
  9. Adenosine Contrast Correlations in Evaluating Revascularization: The (ACCELERATION) Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun; 18(6):e015240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.217
  10. The Hype Cycle in Interventional Cardiology and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 15; 225:35-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  11. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  12. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  13. Exploring the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 15; 207:505-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  14. Cut, score, press, shock, or ablate? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 05; 101(6):975-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  15. Better together? Maybe not with CTO-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 03; 101(4):828-829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  16. Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  17. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  18. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023 01; 12(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  19. Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  20. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  21. Intravascular ultrasound: Beneficial even with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 07 01; 98(1):10-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  22. QFR accuracy and Pd/pa:FFR discordance: Too much inside baseball or novel physiologic insight? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 01; 97(5):833-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  23. FFRCT : Getting better all the time (but not there yet). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 03; 97(4):623-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  24. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio - Can we really get there from here? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1154-1155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  25. Comparing QFR and FFR in small vessels-Expanding the spectrum of use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):752-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  26. Hot topics in interventional cardiology: Proceedings from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions 2020 think tank. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1258-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  27. Considerations for cardiac catheterization laboratory procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic perspectives from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Emerging Leader Mentorship (SCAI ELM) Members and Graduates. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 09 01; 96(3):586-597.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  28. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  29. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  30. Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 09 01; 94(3):364-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  31. High FFR strongly predicts arterial graft dysfunction: pure benefit in a pure population? Eur Heart J. 2019 08 01; 40(29):2429-2431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  32. Why does FFR-guided PCI improve clinical outcomes? The missing link of post-PCI ischemia reduction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):701-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  33. FFR-Guided CABG: Will Simpler and Better Be Enough to Change Practice? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 11(6):e006827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  34. Bifurcation lesion assessment with advanced quantitative coronary angiography: A method still wanting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 91(7):1271-1272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  35. The occult hemodynamically significant left main stenosis in the asymptomatic patient: Reconciling the visual-functional mismatch - A case report and review of screening appropriateness and assessment of left main in patient with multi-vessel CAD. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 10; 19(7 Pt A):805-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  36. Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 11 27; 10(22):2233-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  37. One catheter or two? Tomayto or Tomahto? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 08 01; 90(2):249-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  38. Aspiration thrombectomy and intracoronary tirofiban via GuideLiner? catheter for a thrombosed aneurysmal vessel. Future Cardiol. 2017 03; 13(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  39. Does pre-PCI FFR predict post-PCI blood flow increase? do we need IMR too? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 02 01; 89(2):243-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  40. Myocardial Contrast Stress Echo Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A Fair Fight Among Ischemic Tests? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 08; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  41. Transulnar catheterization: The road less traveled. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr; 87(5):866-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  42. AVERTing contrast nephropathy--delivering less to get more? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 01; 86(7):1234-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  43. Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep 01; 84(3):416-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  44. Disparity between angiographic coronary lesion complexity and lipid core plaques assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(3):529-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  45. Sudden onset congestive heart failure with a continuous murmur: ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm complicated by anomalous origin of the left coronary artery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Jan-Mar; 9(1):41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  46. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  47. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  48. Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 09 15; 9(18):e018344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  49. Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD?Revascularization Following Physiological?Coronary?Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 02 05; 73(4):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  50. Letter by Kern et al Regarding Article, "Effects of Impella on Coronary Perfusion in Patients With Critical Coronary Artery Stenosis". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 02; 12(2):e007751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  51. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec; 10(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  52. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 05 11; 376(19):1824-1834.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.