Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Coronary Angiography

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Coronary Angiography.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
8.731
Coronary Angiography
  1. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.593
  2. Does the AToMIC trial explode concerns of contrast coagulopathy? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov; 88(5):738-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.508
  3. Is the left main just another artery to FFR? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 86(1):19-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  4. A return to a commonsense MI definition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr; 85(5):930-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  5. Balloon-assisted tracking for transradial catheterization: beating the curve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb; 83(2):221-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  6. Perioperative MI: is there a clot or not? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 01; 82(4):629-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  7. Upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for STEMI: use on-time or not at all? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May 01; 79(6):965-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.372
  8. The Hype Cycle in Interventional Cardiology and Quantitative Flow Ratio. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Aug 15; 225:35-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  9. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  10. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  11. Exploring the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 15; 207:505-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  12. Cut, score, press, shock, or ablate? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 05; 101(6):975-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  13. Better together? Maybe not with CTO-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 03; 101(4):828-829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  14. Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  15. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  16. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023 01; 12(1):21-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  17. Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  18. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  19. Intravascular ultrasound: Beneficial even with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 07 01; 98(1):10-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  20. QFR accuracy and Pd/pa:FFR discordance: Too much inside baseball or novel physiologic insight? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 01; 97(5):833-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  21. FFRCT : Getting better all the time (but not there yet). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 03; 97(4):623-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  22. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio - Can we really get there from here? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1154-1155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  23. Comparing QFR and FFR in small vessels-Expanding the spectrum of use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):752-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  24. Hot topics in interventional cardiology: Proceedings from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions 2020 think tank. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1258-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  25. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  26. Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 09 01; 94(3):364-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  27. High FFR strongly predicts arterial graft dysfunction: pure benefit in a pure population? Eur Heart J. 2019 08 01; 40(29):2429-2431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  28. Why does FFR-guided PCI improve clinical outcomes? The missing link of post-PCI ischemia reduction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):701-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  29. FFR-Guided CABG: Will Simpler and Better Be Enough to Change Practice? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 11(6):e006827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  30. Bifurcation lesion assessment with advanced quantitative coronary angiography: A method still wanting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 06; 91(7):1271-1272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  31. The occult hemodynamically significant left main stenosis in the asymptomatic patient: Reconciling the visual-functional mismatch - A case report and review of screening appropriateness and assessment of left main in patient with multi-vessel CAD. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 10; 19(7 Pt A):805-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  32. One catheter or two? Tomayto or Tomahto? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 08 01; 90(2):249-250.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  33. Aspiration thrombectomy and intracoronary tirofiban via GuideLiner? catheter for a thrombosed aneurysmal vessel. Future Cardiol. 2017 03; 13(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  34. Does pre-PCI FFR predict post-PCI blood flow increase? do we need IMR too? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 02 01; 89(2):243-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  35. Myocardial Contrast Stress Echo Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A Fair Fight Among Ischemic Tests? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 08; 9(8).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  36. Transulnar catheterization: The road less traveled. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr; 87(5):866-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  37. AVERTing contrast nephropathy--delivering less to get more? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 01; 86(7):1234-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  38. Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep 01; 84(3):416-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  39. Disparity between angiographic coronary lesion complexity and lipid core plaques assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(3):529-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  40. Sudden onset congestive heart failure with a continuous murmur: ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm complicated by anomalous origin of the left coronary artery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Jan-Mar; 9(1):41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  41. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  42. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  43. Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 09 15; 9(18):e018344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  44. Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD?Revascularization Following Physiological?Coronary?Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 02 05; 73(4):444-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  45. Letter by Kern et al Regarding Article, "Effects of Impella on Coronary Perfusion in Patients With Critical Coronary Artery Stenosis". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 02; 12(2):e007751.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  46. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec; 10(12).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  47. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 05 11; 376(19):1824-1834.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.