Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
21.293
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  1. Does PPG, the Other Dimension to FFR, Better Predict Post-PCI Results? Circulation. 2024 Aug 20; 150(8):598-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.781
  2. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.760
  3. Does ejection fraction matter in choosing between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 103(5):826-827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.759
  4. Can We Predict Who Will Have Angina Relief From Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 04; 16(4):e013020.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.709
  5. Better together? Maybe not with CTO-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 03; 101(4):828-829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.706
  6. SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 04 10; 16(7):847-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.702
  7. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.694
  8. Closing the loop in cath lab communication: Avoiding the tower of babble. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 06; 99(7):1963-1964.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.670
  9. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  10. Clinical risk overlaps both bare metal and drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 02; 99(3):552-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.655
  11. How strong is the warranty of a negative FFR? Comment on long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions by Weerts et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 02 01; 97(2):257-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.611
  12. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio - Can we really get there from here? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1154-1155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.601
  13. Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Feb; 18(2):103-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.573
  14. Does "Myocardial Injury" Matter Post-PCI? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 14; 12(19):1963-1965.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.558
  15. What patients want. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 06 01; 93(7):1244-1245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.544
  16. The calculus of preloading antiplatelet agents in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Does it make a difference? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 03 01; 93(4):602-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.535
  17. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  18. Caution! You're approaching a gray zone: FFR outcomes and the role of CFR and IMR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 11 15; 92(6):1088-1089.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  19. Why does FFR-guided PCI improve clinical outcomes? The missing link of post-PCI ischemia reduction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):701-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.520
  20. Newsflash, PCI Works: Stenting Stenoses Increases Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise and Reduces Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 08 28; 72(9):984-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.516
  21. Length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: An expert consensus document update from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):717-731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  22. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pressure Pullback With Virtual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planning: Seeing the Future of Coronary Interventions? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 04 23; 11(8):768-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  23. Early stent thrombosis: Nearly gone, but never forgotten. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 04 01; 91(5):849-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  24. Does the AToMIC trial explode concerns of contrast coagulopathy? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov; 88(5):738-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  25. Why we need intravenous antiplatelet agents. Future Cardiol. 2016 09; 12(5):553-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  26. Antiplatelet agents in transradial primary PCI: safe enough to be aggressive. Coron Artery Dis. 2016 06; 27(4):255-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  27. Late breaking trials of 2015 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering ACC, EuroPCR, SCAI, TCT, ESC, and AHA. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun; 87(7):1224-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  28. Coronary perforation: What color is your parachute? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep; 86(3):405-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  29. 38 mm Stents: go big and go long. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 01; 85(2):225-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  30. Direct stenting for STEMI: does it really make a difference? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15; 84(6):932-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  31. Are veterans and the VA any more "crusty" than others? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 01; 84(4):644-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.394
  32. Glycoprotein inhibitors: not dead yet. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 01; 82(2):182-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  33. Interventional Cardiologists' Perspectives on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Ambulatory Surgical Centers. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 12; 106(7):3796-3806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  34. Mechanical outcomes of coronary stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Sep 15; 435:133387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  35. Coronary computed tomography angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: Expert opinion from a SCAI/SCCT roundtable. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025 May-Jun; 19(3):277-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  36. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Super High-Pressure Balloon (SIS-OPN) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 03; 105(4):938-950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  37. Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access for Coronary Procedures: A Pooled Learning Curve Analysis From the FAUST and UNIVERSAL Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 08; 17(8):e013817.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  38. Microvascular Resistance Reserve and?the?STEMI Patient: Putting a Finer Point on the CFR Pencil? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 27; 17(10):1228-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  39. Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration. EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 01; 20(1):66-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  40. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  41. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  42. Transradial Access for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications of the Risk-Treatment Paradox. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 07; 14(7):e009328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  43. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 26; 14(8):907-916.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  44. Hot topics in interventional cardiology: Proceedings from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions 2020 think tank. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1258-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  45. Early vs Late Discharge in Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 11; 21(11):1360-1368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  46. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  47. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  48. Same-day discharge among patients undergoing elective PCI: Insights from the VA CART Program. Am Heart J. 2019 12; 218:75-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  49. Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 09 01; 4(9):857-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  50. Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 01 22; 8(2):e010373.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  51. Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 11 27; 10(22):2233-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  52. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 05 11; 376(19):1824-1834.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  53. Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Concurrent Active Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct; 8(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  54. Intensive Training and Real-Time Quality Control by a Physiology Core Laboratory: Lessons From DEFINE-PCI. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 07; 13(7):e009077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.