Header Logo

Connection

Arnold Seto to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Treatment Outcome.
Arnold Seto
Connection Strength
9.294
Treatment Outcome
  1. Does pre-PCI FFR predict post-PCI blood flow increase? do we need IMR too? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 02 01; 89(2):243-244.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  2. On the search for an "easy" FFR: Submaximal hyperemia and NTG-induced translesional pressure drop (Pd/Pa-NTG). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 01; 87(2):270-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.411
  3. Does PPG, the Other Dimension to FFR, Better Predict Post-PCI Results? Circulation. 2024 Aug 20; 150(8):598-599.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  4. Microvascular Resistance Reserve and?the?STEMI Patient: Putting a Finer Point on the CFR Pencil? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 27; 17(10):1228-1230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  5. Virtual FFR From Optical Coherence Tomography: A 1-Stop Shop for PCI Guidance? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 17(4):e014077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.181
  6. Does ejection fraction matter in choosing between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr; 103(5):826-827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  7. The thoracic duct: The final frontier for intervention? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 05; 101(6):1170-1171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  8. Can We Predict Who Will Have Angina Relief From Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 04; 16(4):e013020.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  9. Cut, score, press, shock, or ablate? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 05; 101(6):975-977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  10. Better together? Maybe not with CTO-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 03; 101(4):828-829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  11. SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 04 10; 16(7):847-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  12. Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  13. The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  14. Driving quality improvement with nudges: True interventions in cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 11; 100(6):948-949.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  15. Should doctors replace machines in prehospital electrocardiogram interpretation? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 09; 100(3):304-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  16. Closing the loop in cath lab communication: Avoiding the tower of babble. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 06; 99(7):1963-1964.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  17. Should CFR Be Routinely Measured in the Cath Lab? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 05 23; 15(10):1057-1059.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  18. Radial Hemostasis Is Facilitated With a Potassium Ferrate Hemostatic Patch: The STAT2 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 04 25; 15(8):810-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  19. Ejection Fraction as the Key to Improvement in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 04; 15(4):e012000.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  20. Clinical risk overlaps both bare metal and drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 02; 99(3):552-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  21. Making sense of the costs of life and death interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 10; 98(4):711-712.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  22. A stitch in time saves? uncontrollable blood loss. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 09; 98(3):578-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  23. Acute kidney injury in cardiogenic shock: The powerful distortions of survivor bias. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 08 01; 98(2):341-342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  24. Intravascular ultrasound: Beneficial even with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 07 01; 98(1):10-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  25. Heparin, compression, and radial artery occlusion: Less is more. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 06 01; 97(7):1377-1378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  26. Post-dilation in ST-elevation MI patients makes sense anatomically, but does it improve physiology? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 06 01; 97(7):1318-1319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  27. QFR accuracy and Pd/pa:FFR discordance: Too much inside baseball or novel physiologic insight? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 01; 97(5):833-835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  28. FFRCT : Getting better all the time (but not there yet). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 03; 97(4):623-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  29. How strong is the warranty of a negative FFR? Comment on long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions by Weerts et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 02 01; 97(2):257-258.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  30. Percutaneous axillary access: A call to arms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 12; 96(7):1489-1490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  31. Predicting post stent fractional flow reserve virtually from quantitative flow ratio - Can we really get there from here? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 11; 96(6):1154-1155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  32. Comparing QFR and FFR in small vessels-Expanding the spectrum of use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):752-754.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  33. Collaterals in STEMI patients: An uncommon but critical lifeline. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 09 01; 96(3):534-535.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  34. Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on translesional coronary hemodynamics. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 10 01; 96(4):871-877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  35. Transseptal Puncture Guided by Electroanatomic Mapping: A Novel Fluoroscopically and Echocardiographically Free?Method. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 05 25; 13(10):1233-1235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  36. Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Feb; 18(2):103-115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  37. Do hemodynamics matter in the treatment of patients with submassive pulmonary emboli? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 04 01; 95(5):E165-E167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  38. Better measurement repeatability of FFR than CFR: Role of the human error factor. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 11 01; 94(5):684-685.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  39. Does "Myocardial Injury" Matter Post-PCI? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 14; 12(19):1963-1965.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  40. Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 09 01; 94(3):364-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  41. What patients want. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 06 01; 93(7):1244-1245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  42. Radial haemostasis is facilitated with a potassium ferrate haemostatic patch: the Statseal with TR Band assessment trial (STAT). EuroIntervention. 2018 Dec 07; 14(11):e1236-e1242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  43. Why does FFR-guided PCI improve clinical outcomes? The missing link of post-PCI ischemia reduction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):701-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  44. The Challenges of Measuring Coronary Flow Reserve: Comparisons of Doppler and Thermodilution to [15O]H2O PET Perfusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 22; 11(20):2055-2057.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  45. Length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: An expert consensus document update from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 10 01; 92(4):717-731.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  46. Early stent thrombosis: Nearly gone, but never forgotten. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 04 01; 91(5):849-850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  47. Breaking the code: What is the best post-PCI MI definition? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 04; 89(5):857-859.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  48. Late breaking trials of 2016 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering SCAI, ACC, TCT, EuroPCR, ESC, and AHA. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May; 89(6):1028-1034.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  49. Aspiration thrombectomy and intracoronary tirofiban via GuideLiner? catheter for a thrombosed aneurysmal vessel. Future Cardiol. 2017 03; 13(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  50. Antiplatelet agents in transradial primary PCI: safe enough to be aggressive. Coron Artery Dis. 2016 06; 27(4):255-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  51. Transulnar catheterization: The road less traveled. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr; 87(5):866-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  52. Late breaking trials of 2015 in coronary artery disease: Commentary covering ACC, EuroPCR, SCAI, TCT, ESC, and AHA. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun; 87(7):1224-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  53. Simulator training: The bridge between "primum non nocere" and "learning by doing". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 15; 87(3):381-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  54. AVERTing contrast nephropathy--delivering less to get more? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 01; 86(7):1234-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  55. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb; 8(2):283-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  56. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul; 3(7):751-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  57. Sudden onset congestive heart failure with a continuous murmur: ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm complicated by anomalous origin of the left coronary artery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Jan-Mar; 9(1):41-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  58. Interventional Cardiologists' Perspectives on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Ambulatory Surgical Centers. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 12; 106(7):3796-3806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  59. Mechanical outcomes of coronary stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Sep 15; 435:133387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  60. Coronary computed tomography angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: Expert opinion from a SCAI/SCCT roundtable. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025 May-Jun; 19(3):277-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  61. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Super High-Pressure Balloon (SIS-OPN) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 03; 105(4):938-950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  62. Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access for Coronary Procedures: A Pooled Learning Curve Analysis From the FAUST and UNIVERSAL Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 08; 17(8):e013817.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  63. Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant-level data metaanalysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration. EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 01; 20(1):66-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  64. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  65. 1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  66. Transradial Access for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications of the Risk-Treatment Paradox. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 07; 14(7):e009328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  67. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 04 26; 14(8):907-916.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  68. Early vs Late Discharge in Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 11; 21(11):1360-1368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  69. Effects of pericardial tamponade on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 07; 96(1):236-242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  70. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  71. Outcomes With Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization of Coronary Lesions With Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve Values. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 12; 12(12):e008315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  72. Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  73. Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):2035-2046.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  74. Association of Physician Specialty With Long-Term Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Complication and Reoperations Rates. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 06; 12(6):e005374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  75. Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 08 13; 11(15):1437-1449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  76. The occult hemodynamically significant left main stenosis in the asymptomatic patient: Reconciling the visual-functional mismatch - A case report and review of screening appropriateness and assessment of left main in patient with multi-vessel CAD. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 10; 19(7 Pt A):805-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  77. Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Concurrent Active Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct; 8(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.