Arnold Seto to Coronary Vessels
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arnold Seto has written about Coronary Vessels.
Connection Strength
5.542
-
Understanding the mechanism of improved CFR after TAVR/SAVR - the importance of basal flow. EuroIntervention. 2023 02 20; 18(14):1129-1130.
Score: 0.793
-
Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 04; 8(2):121-129.
Score: 0.598
-
Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers. Circulation. 2017 12 12; 136(24):2295-2297.
Score: 0.553
-
Is the left main just another artery to FFR? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 86(1):19-20.
Score: 0.467
-
Selecting the Right Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unsteady State: Keep It Simple. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul; 8(8):1028-1030.
Score: 0.467
-
Variations of coronary hemodynamic responses to intravenous adenosine infusion: implications for fractional flow reserve measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep 01; 84(3):416-25.
Score: 0.420
-
Microvascular Resistance Reserve and?the?STEMI Patient: Putting a Finer Point on the CFR Pencil? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 27; 17(10):1228-1230.
Score: 0.216
-
Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
Score: 0.212
-
Exploring the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2023 11 15; 207:505-506.
Score: 0.207
-
Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023 01; 12(1):21-29.
Score: 0.194
-
Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
Score: 0.193
-
Collaterals in STEMI patients: An uncommon but critical lifeline. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 09 01; 96(3):534-535.
Score: 0.167
-
Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary?Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):1991-2001.
Score: 0.158
-
Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 10 28; 12(20):2035-2046.
Score: 0.158
-
Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 09 01; 94(3):364-366.
Score: 0.156
-
Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD?Revascularization Following Physiological?Coronary?Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 02 05; 73(4):444-453.
Score: 0.150
-
dPR, Another Diastolic Resting Pressure Ratio. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 12; 11(12):e007540.
Score: 0.148
-
ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec; 10(12).
Score: 0.138
-
Disparity between angiographic coronary lesion complexity and lipid core plaques assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(3):529-37.
Score: 0.096
-
Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
Score: 0.052