Header Logo

Connection

Tina Pesaran to Breast Neoplasms

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Tina Pesaran has written about Breast Neoplasms.
Connection Strength

2.549
  1. Association of gene variant type and location with breast cancer risk in the general population. Ann Oncol. 2025 Aug; 36(8):954-963.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  2. Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes Predispose to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 06; 31(1):130-138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  3. Functional analysis and clinical classification of 462 germline BRCA2 missense variants affecting the DNA binding domain. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 03 07; 111(3):584-593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  4. Functional and Clinical Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance Identifies a Hotspot for Inactivating Missense Variants in RAD51C. Cancer Res. 2023 08 01; 83(15):2557-2571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  5. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. J Clin Oncol. 2021 12 10; 39(35):3918-3926.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  6. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Test Results for Women With Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 10 01; 113(10):1429-1433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  7. Risk of Late-Onset Breast Cancer in Genetically Predisposed Women. J Clin Oncol. 2021 11 01; 39(31):3430-3440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  8. Strong functional data for pathogenicity or neutrality classify BRCA2 DNA-binding-domain variants of uncertain significance. Am J Hum Genet. 2021 03 04; 108(3):458-468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  9. The Contribution of Germline Predisposition Gene Mutations to Clinical Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancer From a Clinical Genetic Testing Cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 12 14; 112(12):1231-1241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  10. Suggested application of HER2+ breast tumor phenotype for germline TP53 variant classification within ACMG/AMP guidelines. Hum Mutat. 2020 09; 41(9):1555-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  11. Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort. Genet Med. 2020 04; 22(4):701-708.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  12. p53 major hotspot variants are associated with poorer prognostic features in hereditary cancer patients. Cancer Genet. 2019 06; 235-236:21-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  13. DNA breakpoint assay reveals a majority of gross duplications occur in tandem reducing VUS classifications in breast cancer predisposition genes. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):683-693.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  14. Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 01; 3(9):1190-1196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  15. Combined genetic and splicing analysis of BRCA1 c.[594-2A>C; 641A>G] highlights the relevance of naturally occurring in-frame transcripts for developing disease gene variant classification algorithms. Hum Mol Genet. 2016 06 01; 25(11):2256-2268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  16. ClinGen and Genetic Testing. N Engl J Med. 2015 10; 373(14):1376-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  17. Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Sep 05; 111(9):2044-2058.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Genet Med. 2020 02; 22(2):407-415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.