Header Logo

Connection

Robert Jenders to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Jenders has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.657
  1. Evaluation of Arden Syntax v3.0 to Represent Population-Level Clinical Decision Support Knowledge in Electronic Clinical Quality Measures. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Aug 07; 329:1564-1565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  2. Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016. Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug; 26(1):125-132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  3. Evaluation of SNOMED CT as a Reference Terminology for Standardized Data Queries in the Arden Syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:1326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  4. Evolution of the Arden Syntax: Key Technical Issues from the Standards Development Organization Perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2018 11; 92:10-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  5. Using animation as an information tool to advance health research literacy among minority participants. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013; 2013:475-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  6. Recommendations for clinical decision support deployment: synthesis of a roundtable of medical directors of information systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 359-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  7. Accuracy of an XGBoost-based privacy preserving record linkage system compared with an electronic health record patient matching module in identifying patients shared between nearby academic health centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2026 Apr 01; 33(4):901-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Classification of psychiatric disorders. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19; 294(15):1899; author reply 1899-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. Feasibility of Fuzzy Control Aggregation in Clinical Decision Support Using HL7 Arden Syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Oct 02; 332:37-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. Fuzzy Arden Syntax Connectives in Clinical Medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Jun 26; 328:36-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. Clinical Automata in Fuzzy Arden Syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Jun 26; 328:163-167.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. Integrated Perspectives on Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Management Approaches. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22; 316:1822-1826.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  13. Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 30; 28(8):1796-1806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  14. Challenges in using the Arden Syntax for computer-based nosocomial infection surveillance. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001; 289-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  15. Model-based immunization information routing. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 878-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  16. Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; 226-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  17. Use of a hospital practice management system to provide initial data for a pediatric immunization registry. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; 286-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  18. Design and implementation of a multi-institution immunization registry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998; 52 Pt 1:45-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  19. Medical decision support: experience with implementing the Arden Syntax at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; 169-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  20. Use of open standards to implement health maintenance guidelines in a clinical workstation. Comput Biol Med. 1994 Sep; 24(5):385-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  21. Indexing guidelines: applications in use of pulmonary artery catheters and pressure ulcer prevention. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 802-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  22. Providing clinicians with problem-based access to knowledge: troubleshooting pulmonary artery catheter waveforms. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993; 351-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  23. A systematic literature review of automated clinical coding and classification systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec; 17(6):646-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Evidence-based criteria to help distinguish metastatic breast cancer from primary lung adenocarcinoma on thoracic frozen section. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jan; 131(1):122-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan: report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(4):365-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  26. Hospitalization and Alzheimer's disease: results from a community-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 May; 54(5):M267-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  27. Translating national childhood immunization guidelines to a computer-based reminder recall system within an immunization registry. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; 994-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  28. Design of a clinical event monitor. Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun; 29(3):194-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Using intermediate states to improve the ability of the Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; 238-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. The PA Catheter Waveforms Troubleshooting System: a demonstration of simple graphical knowledge access for clinical care. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 1052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. The computer-based clinical record--where do we stand? Ann Intern Med. 1993 Nov 15; 119(10):1046-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.