Robert Jenders to Decision Support Systems, Clinical
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Jenders has written about Decision Support Systems, Clinical.
Connection Strength
6.628
-
Evaluation of Arden Syntax v3.0 to Represent Population-Level Clinical Decision Support Knowledge in Electronic Clinical Quality Measures. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Aug 07; 329:1564-1565.
Score: 0.941
-
Arden Syntax: Then, now, and in the future. Artif Intell Med. 2018 11; 92:1-6.
Score: 0.588
-
Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016. Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug; 26(1):125-132.
Score: 0.544
-
Evaluation of SNOMED CT as a Reference Terminology for Standardized Data Queries in the Arden Syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017; 245:1326.
Score: 0.518
-
Evolution of the Arden Syntax: Key Technical Issues from the Standards Development Organization Perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2018 11; 92:10-14.
Score: 0.504
-
Utility of Arden Syntax for Representation of Fuzzy Logic in Clinical Quality Measures. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:1096.
Score: 0.451
-
Empirical analysis of knowledge bases to support structured output in the Arden syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:1058.
Score: 0.393
-
Standards in clinical decision support: activities in health level seven. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 06; 1244-5.
Score: 0.295
-
Recommendations for clinical decision support deployment: synthesis of a roundtable of medical directors of information systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 359-63.
Score: 0.273
-
Fuzzy Arden Syntax Connectives in Clinical Medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Jun 26; 328:36-40.
Score: 0.233
-
Clinical Automata in Fuzzy Arden Syntax. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Jun 26; 328:163-167.
Score: 0.233
-
Integrated Perspectives on Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Management Approaches. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22; 316:1822-1826.
Score: 0.220
-
Convergence on a standard for representing clinical guidelines: work in health level seven. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 1):130-4.
Score: 0.210
-
Challenges in implementing a knowledge editor for the Arden Syntax: knowledge base maintenance and standardization of database linkages. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002; 355-9.
Score: 0.183
-
Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 07 30; 28(8):1796-1806.
Score: 0.178
-
A Comparison of Arden Syntax and Clinical Quality Language as Knowledge Representation Formalisms for Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 05; 12(3):495-506.
Score: 0.177
-
Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000; 146-50.
Score: 0.160
-
Evolution of a knowledge base for a clinical decision support system encoded in the Arden Syntax. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998; 558-62.
Score: 0.139
-
Clinical information system services and capabilities desired for scalable, standards-based, service-oriented decision support: consensus assessment of the Health Level 7 clinical decision support Work Group. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012; 2012:446-55.
Score: 0.097
-
Standards in health information technology: promise and challenges. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11; 1179-80.
Score: 0.068
-
Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan: report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug; 12(4):365-76.
Score: 0.057
-
Making the standard more standard: a data and query model for knowledge representation in the Arden syntax. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 323-30.
Score: 0.049
-
Challenges in using the Arden Syntax for computer-based nosocomial infection surveillance. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001; 289-93.
Score: 0.043
-
Translating national childhood immunization guidelines to a computer-based reminder recall system within an immunization registry. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999; 994-8.
Score: 0.037
-
Design and implementation of a multi-institution immunization registry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998; 52 Pt 1:45-9.
Score: 0.035