Predictive Value of Tests
"Predictive Value of Tests" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test.
| Descriptor ID |
D011237
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.780.800.650 N05.715.360.780.700.640 N06.850.520.445.800.650
|
| Concept/Terms |
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Predictive Value of Tests".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Predictive Value of Tests".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Predictive Value of Tests" by people in this website by year, and whether "Predictive Value of Tests" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2003 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2004 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2005 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2007 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2008 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 2009 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 2010 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2011 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2012 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 2013 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2014 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2016 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2017 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2018 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 2020 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 2021 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Predictive Value of Tests" by people in Profiles.
-
Patient-Specific Myocardial Infarction Risk Thresholds From AI-Enabled Coronary Plaque Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Oct; 17(10):e016958.
-
Does PPG, the Other Dimension to FFR, Better Predict Post-PCI Results? Circulation. 2024 Aug 20; 150(8):598-599.
-
Microvascular Resistance Reserve and?the?STEMI Patient: Putting a Finer Point on the CFR Pencil? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 27; 17(10):1228-1230.
-
Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other. Cardiol Clin. 2024 Feb; 42(1):21-29.
-
Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2023 Dec 18; 19(11):e903-e912.
-
Can Automating the SYNTAX Score Move Practice Beyond the Angiogram Alone? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12 26; 15(24):2487-2489.
-
The future of angiography: Estimates of FFR pre- and post-PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 12; 100(7):1218-1219.
-
Does Diabetes Affect Angiographically Derived (QFR) Translesional Physiology?: Looking at the FAVOR III Diabetic Subset. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1265-1267.
-
Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 05; 24(5):541-550.
-
1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual?Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 01 10; 15(1):52-61.